Incogni Review (2026): Automated Data Removal, Honestly Assessed

Last reviewed September 29, 2026 · pricing snapshot 2026-09-29 (re-verify on the official page)

Evidence base: Incogni is evaluated on its public Deloitte ISAE 3000 report, documented process, and cited pricing — not hands-on tests. No in-house lab testing. How we evaluate

Incogni is a data-removal service that automates the broker opt-out work and re-does it on a schedule — and the schedule is the story. Its verified case: an independent Deloitte ISAE 3000 limited-assurance report (published August 2025) covering 420+ brokers and 245M+ removal requests processed, with documented resubmission cycles every 60 days (public data) / 90 days (private), and a no-monetization-of-subscriber-data commitment. From Surfshark B.V. (Amsterdam, EU/GDPR), Incogni runs ~$95.88/year standard on annual billing (30-day money-back). Its honest limits: removal is probabilistic (broker compliance varies), coverage is region-limited (~30+ regions, mainly North America and EU), and the recurring cycles exist precisely because brokers re-add data — the pattern that makes “instant, permanent removal” claims false everywhere in this category.

Who it's for: people who want removal handled continuously without managing per-site requests themselves, and who want a service whose process is externally audited. Who should skip it: very light exposure (the free opt-out ladder is enough), anyone outside the supported regions, and anyone expecting instant or guaranteed results.

Compare it to DeleteMe → · Start with the free path →

How Incogni works

  • DSR automation: Incogni files data-subject removal requests across its broker network on your behalf, so you don't manage per-site forms.
  • The 60/90-day resubmission cycles: public-data removals are re-filed every 60 days; private-data every 90 days. This is not a marketing detail — it is the honest core: brokers re-collect public records, so removal decays without repetition. Any service promising one-time removal is either misinformed or overselling.
  • What it does not do: erase source records (court, county, licensing), remove data from sites outside its network, or guarantee any specific broker complies. Coverage is region-limited per the fact pack.

The consequence for expectations: Incogni keeps filing, which is the point — but “removed today” ≠ “removed forever,” and the service's own documented cycles say so.

The Deloitte audit (the differentiator)

This is the primary-source anchor no ranking competitor cites: Incogni's removal process is covered by a Deloitte ISAE 3000 limited-assurance engagement (report published August 2025), publicly hosted as a PDF. Reported scope:

  • 420+ broker coverage documented in the audited process.
  • 245M+ removal requests processed.
  • 60-day (public) / 90-day (private) resubmission cycles documented as the process standard.
  • Subscriber data is not monetized (an audited-process commitment).

Honesty note: ISAE 3000 limitedassurance means Deloitte examined the process description — it is not a guarantee of outcomes and says nothing about how much of your data gets removed. That distinction is exactly what most review pages skip; this page states it. The audit link is in Sources.

Pricing

PlanPrice (snapshot)Notes
Standard~$7.99/mo billed annually (~$95.88/yr)1 person; ~$15.98/mo if billed monthly
Unlimited~$14.99–17.99/mo annualAdds custom removal requests + live phone support
Family~$15.99/mo annual (5 members)Family Unlimited ~$22.99/mo

Renewal reality: annual billing roughly halves the monthly-equivalent; the monthly baseline (~$15.98/mo standard) is the de-facto renewal rate — the discount is for paying the year up front. There is a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Incogni — pending approval

Our Incogni affiliate application is pending approval, so this is a marked slot, not a commission link — and we don't invent statuses. On approval, this slot becomes a disclosed affiliate CTA under the site's standard (disclosure above the link, rel="sponsored nofollow"). Claims rule stays: no “100% removal guaranteed.”

Region availability

The fact pack's honest limit: coverage is regional — ~30+ regions, mainly North America and the EU. Outside those, the service can't file effectively; this review states that rather than implying global coverage. If you're outside the supported regions, the free opt-out ladder (how to delete yourself from the internet) is the honest starting point.

Incogni vs DeleteMe

  • Incogni — automated requests with documented 60/90-day resubmission against 420+ brokers; a public Deloitte ISAE 3000 report; ~$95.88/yr annual; 30-day money-back.
  • DeleteMe — human operators with up to 40 custom removal requests/person/yr and quarterly reports; annual-only ($129/yr); weeks-to-months removals.

Run the full comparison → — the monetized bridge for the cluster.

Surfshark-family jurisdiction (disclosed)

Incogni is built by Surfshark B.V., Amsterdam — the same parent as the Surfshark VPN we review. That's disclosed factually, not hidden: it means EU/GDPR jurisdiction, and it means our Surfshark review and this page share a corporate parent in the ecosystem — stated openly so you can weigh it. [NEEDS SOURCE] on any specific corporate-structure change since the fact-pack retrieval.

Who should skip it

FAQ

Is Incogni legit?

Yes — it's operated by Surfshark B.V. (Amsterdam), and its removal process is covered by a public Deloitte ISAE 3000 limited-assurance report (Aug 2025). The honest caveat: limited assurance examines the process, not removal outcomes; it is not a guarantee.

How much does Incogni cost?

~$7.99/mo billed annually (~$95.88/yr) for Standard; Unlimited ~$14.99+/mo annual; Family (5) ~$15.99/mo annual. The monthly-billing rate is roughly double (~$15.98/mo), and there's a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Does Incogni remove everything?

No — removal is probabilistic; broker compliance varies, coverage is region-limited, and the 60/90-day resubmission cycles exist because brokers re-add data. This page makes no "100% removal" claim, and Incogni's own terms bar that language.

Why do removals repeat every 60/90 days?

Because public records re-collect: brokers rebuild profiles as sources update, so removal decays without repetition. The cycles are the honest mechanism, not a defect.

Incogni or DeleteMe?

Automated recurring coverage with an audited process (Incogni) vs human operators with custom requests (DeleteMe) — the bridge runs the full table; pick by which model fits your exposure and billing preference.

Verdict

Incogni is the audited, automated option: a public Deloitte report, 420+ brokers, and 60/90-day resubmission cycles that state the category's honest truth — removal is recurring maintenance, not one-time erasure. At ~$95.88/yr with a 30-day money-back, it fits readers who want continuous coverage without per-site work and value a citable audit trail. It does not fit light exposure, unsupported regions, or anyone expecting guarantees.

Disclosure: IncomeGenius is independent and reader-supported. Buying through some links on this page may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you — and it never changes what we write. Every claim here rests on published audits, documented processes, and cited figures, not on commission size. We do not claim hands-on lab testing, and we say so rather than implying we tested. We accept no sponsored placement that alters a review or verdict.

NordVPN — approved interim (privacy stack)

Incogni's approval is pending, so our approved privacy-lane partner covers the gap: NordVPN's audited no-logs line protects the accounts you keep while removal work runs on the public layer.

Check current price at NordVPN

Prices change frequently — verify on the official pricing page before you commit. 30-day money-back guarantee on covered plans.

Tracker: pending affiliate registration — this link is the vendor's direct page until the IncomeGenius CJ property goes live.

Related guides

Sources

Every claim is fact-pack-grounded (ig-program-factpacks-2026-09-25.md §5). [NEEDS SOURCE] markers flag fact-pack gaps rather than estimates. “Incogni review” sits at KD 21 — one point above our winnable band, carried openly rather than hidden; the volume justifies the build.